UOP RES709 2021 November Complete Course Latest (Full)

by

RES709 Research Conceptualization And Design

Week 1 Discussion

Never use plagiarized sources. Get Your Original Essay on
UOP RES709 2021 November Complete Course Latest (Full)
Hire Professionals Just from $11/Page
Order Now Click here

DQ1 What Is a Dissertation?

A doctoral journey prepares students to become researchers through learning the research process, culminating in the writing of a dissertation.

Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:

What is a dissertation?

What will it be like for you to write a dissertation? What excites you about the process? What challenges do you expect to encounter?

Note: If you are not writing a dissertation, share a potential research project you will complete. What excites you and what might challenge you about this project?

DQ2 Applied and Basic Research

Basic research and applied research are similar yet provide different outcomes.

Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:

After reading the Week 1 Overview and Ch. 2 of The Action Research Dissertation: A Guide for Students and Faculty from the University Library, think about your future study. What method, basic or applied, seems most appropriate for your project? Explain your position.

 

RES709 Research Conceptualization And Design

Week 2 Discussion

DQ1 Feasibility

Read the following resources from the University Library:

“Developing a Researchable Question” in Project Planner

“Eleven Pitfalls in Qualitative Research: Some Perils Every Emerging Scholar and Doctoral Student Should Be Aware of”

“Develop a Search Strategy: Choose a Topic” > “Your Topic – Too Much? Not Enough?”

Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:

What is your dissertation topic or potential topic?

Is your dissertation topic/idea feasible? Does your topic fall into one of the areas of being too broad, too narrow, or too recent? If so, present some ideas on what you might consider to achieve a feasible research study.

DQ2 Institutional Review Board and Research Ethics

Part 1: Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Visit CDS Central and review the information under the IRB tab.

Select tering for IRB in the IRB Resources table and follow the steps to register.

Once you have registered with IRB, download the What is Research? document at the end of the list of Forms and Templates.

As the first part of your response, describe in your own words (approximately 150–200 words) what research is and explain if your study will involve human subjects.

Part 2: Research Ethics

The development of the field of ethics in research includes numerous historical atrocities and egregious breaches of humane ethical values.

For the second part of your response, research “historical atrocities and research ethics” and share one historical violation that prompted the implementation of ethical standards in research (approximately 150-200 words).

 

RES709 Research Conceptualization And Design

Week 3 Discussion

DQ1 Researchable Problem

Review the following resources:

Ch. 2, “Do You Have an Idea for a Topic?” of Writing Your Doctoral Dissertation or Thesis Faster: A Proven Map to Success from the Week 2 University Library readings

“Strategies to Win: Six-Steps for Creating Problem Statements in Doctoral Research” and Ch. 3, “Do You Have Some Idea How You Will Study Your Topic? Bridging Topic and Methods,” of Writing your Doctoral Dissertation or Thesis Faster: A Proven Map to Success from this week’s University Library readings

Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:

How does a researcher find a researchable problem?

What differentiates a problem from a situation or a statement of opinion or fact?

Why is the problem statement one of the most important components of a doctoral dissertation?

DQ2 Problem Statement Peer-Review

A peer-review process provides doctoral students opportunities to explore their own ideas and thoughts as well as assisting their peers by providing substantive feedback and critical thinking questions and ideas.

View “Alignment of Dissertation Topic to Degree Program” and the Week 3 Overview.

Using the Problem Statement Worksheet, write a 1-sentence original problem for a prospective study you might conduct using the format below:

The problem is _____(state the problem), resulting in ______(state the consequence).

The problem statement sentence must be substantiated with literature to confirm that the problem exists and is more than just your personal opinion or perspective. Cite using a peer reviewed source published between 2017-2022.Include a citation to support the problem and provide a reference.

RES709 Research Conceptualization And Design

Week 4 Discussion

DQ1 Purpose Statement Peer-Review

A peer-review process provides doctoral students opportunities to explore their own ideas and thoughts as well as assisting their peers by providing substantive feedback and critical thinking questions and ideas.

Complete the Purpose Statement Worksheet.

Post your revised problem statement from Week 3 along with a proposed purpose statement for your study.

DQ2 Research Alignment

Read this week’s overview on research alignment.

Write a 250- to 300-word reflective statement in which you describe and evaluate what you learned about research alignment with responses to the following:

How confident are you that your purpose statement aligns with your problem statement?

Reflecting on the weekly overview, what are the specific elements from your problem statement that are carried over to your purpose statement?

 

RES709 Research Conceptualization And Design

Week 5 Discussion

DQ1 Research Questions Versus Interview Questions

Review the weekly overview and reflect on the topic of research questions.

Your research question describes the issue you want to learn about, but you rarely can learn about that issue by asking others that same question.

A research question is broad but specific and should clearly address the topic and the population being studied. It should also be practical and demonstrate the action you are doing.

If your question can only provide a yes/no answer, is too general, or is not feasible, it isn’t a good research question. An example of a poorly written research question might be: What is the role of the nurses in the operating room?

Research questions are not interview questions.

Research Question Example: How do families with school-age children prepare them to be ready for school?

Interview Question Example: How do you get your children ready for school?

That might be all you have to say to learn about how people prepare their kids for school, but you can add probes like: Tell me more about… or you mentioned… or can you give me an example?

You never want to ask a yes/no question in an interview because the response will not provide any reliable data to analyze.

Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:

What is the purpose of research questions?

How are research questions different from interview questions?

How are research questions aligned with the purpose statement?

DQ2 Research Question Peer-Review

A peer-review process provides doctoral students opportunities to explore their own ideas and thoughts as well as assisting their peers by providing substantive feedback and critical thinking questions and ideas.

Locate 2 dissertations in ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global that are focused on your topic. Review the research question(s) in both dissertations to assist in gaining an understanding of how to write your research question(s) for this assignment.

Include links to the dissertations you located and provide References.

Post your purpose statement and two research questions that might be appropriate for your study.

 

RES709 Research Conceptualization And Design

Week 6 Discussion

DQ1 Distinguishing Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods

Read the materials for the week, including the weekly overview.

Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:

Describe qualitative and quantitative research methods.

What is the purpose for each method?

What might be some challenges in using each method?

DQ2 Searching ProQuest Database

Visit ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.

In the search bar, type in a keyword or phrase related to your topic and check the “Doctoral dissertations only” box.

In the left-hand margin narrow the Publication date to the last 5 years (2017-2022).

Locate one qualitative and one quantitative dissertation.

Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:

Describe how a doctoral researcher justified the chosen research method in their dissertation.

Provide a discussion on the method you are proposing and why that method might be the best approach.

 

 

 

RES709 Research Conceptualization And Design

Week 7 Discussion

DQ1 Selecting a Research Design

Review pp. 11-20 of Ch. 1, “The Selection of a Research Approach,” of Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches and the CDS Dissertation Guide.

Provide a minimum 250- to 300-word substantive response on the difference between a research method and a research design. Then list three quantitative and three qualitative research designs and briefly explain each one.

Choose one potential research design and discuss how this design might be appropriate for your study. Be sure to include APA in-text citations and references from the weekly overview as well as other sources.

DQ2 Applied Research Designs

Review the information on Research Designs in the CDS Dissertation Guide.

Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:

How might one of the applied research designs presented in the Dissertation Guide be appropriate for your research plan?

 Be sure to substantiate your discussion using peer-reviewed literature and provide proper citations and references according to APA guidelines.

 

RES709 Research Conceptualization And Design

Week 8 Discussion

DQ1 Framework

View the “Developing a Conceptual or Theoretical Framework” tutorial.

Note: A transcript of the video is available.

Every dissertation needs to have a theoretical foundation and/or a conceptual framework discussion in the literature review section. The theoretical framework will be the lens (perspective) through which you evaluate your research problem and research questions. While a theoretical framework is typically required for quantitative studies, a conceptual framework can be used in qualitative studies. Yet, both theoretical and conceptual frameworks can be used for either quantitative or qualitative studies, depending on the theorist.

You may find it helpful to review some completed dissertations, as you did in Week 6, to gain thoughts and ideas.

Write a substantiated 250- to 300-word response to the following:

State your updated problem statement.

State a theory and/or concept that is applicable to your research and explain how that theory or concept would frame your research.

DQ2 Significance of the Study

Consider the significance or importance of your study using the SPL Model as a foundation.

Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:

How might your study be significant for the scholarly community?

How might your study be significant for practitioners in your field of study?

How might your study be significant for leaders in your field of study?

Be sure to substantiate your discussion using peer-reviewed literature and provide proper citations and references according to APA guidelines.

 

RES709 Research Conceptualization And Design

Week 1 Assignment  

Dissertation Process and Deliverables Matrix and Reflection

Visit CDS Central and download the CDS Dissertation Guide.

This assignment is to help acclimate you to the dissertation journey and to the resources available in CDS Central under the Doctoral Journey tab.

Complete the Dissertation Process and Deliverables Matrix and Reflection.

Refer to the resources above to help you answer the questions.

For a well-structured scholarly paragraph please refer to the MEAL Plan section located within the Dissertation Process and Deliverables Matrix and Reflection.

Use the APA Tutorials located in Doctoral Writing Resources and format your paper according to APA guidelines.

 

RES709 Research Conceptualization And Design

Week 2 Assignment  

Article Analysis and Research Considerations

Knowing the difference between applied and basic research is necessary to develop an effective research study. The difference between basic research and applied research lies in their respective aims.

Basic research refers to research aimed at acquiring new, fundamental knowledge and theoretical understanding of basic human and other natural processes without any particular application in view.

Applied research also is conducted as an original investigation to acquire new knowledge, but it is primarily directed toward practical objectives with the aim of providing relatively immediate solutions.

 This assignment has two parts. Complete Parts 1 and 2 below.

Part 1: Article Analysis

 Locate an applied research article on a topic in your program of study (e.g., DBA, DHA, DM, EDD) from the University Library. To familiarize yourself with the different applied designs, review the qualitative and quantitative research designs in the CDS Dissertation Guide.

Key words to use while searching for an article in the library might include action research, program evaluation, etc.

Write a 350- to 525-word analysis about what makes the study discussed in the article applied versus basic research and do the following:

Identify the article topic (e.g., education, business, health care) and provide a link to the article.

Explain how the study in the article addresses a real-world, practical problem.

Explain how the results of the study could impact people’s lives, work, health, and/or general well-being.

 Part 2: Access and Permission Considerations

 An important aspect of choosing a topic is access or the ability to conduct your study. For example, you may want to know how leaders in a particular company use social media to increase sales, but they are unwilling to talk to you. If you are not able to gain access to the leaders, then you will not be able to gather the data you need for your study.

Additionally, when selecting a topic for your study, consider whether conducting the study would involve talking to protected classes of people or vulnerable populations. Federal regulations require protecting the welfare of vulnerable subjects who may not be of age, have the authority or ability to speak for themselves, or are vulnerable in any other way.

Protected classes include the following:

children or minors under age 18

prisoners

pregnant women

people with cognitive impairments or mental disabilities

people who are educationally or economically disadvantaged

 If you are considering conducting research with any of the protected classes of human subjects, consider options for completing your study in a different way. For example, instead of talking to minor children, talk to their teachers. There are many creative options!

Write a 250- to 500-word summary in which you:

Identify what permissions will you need to access the people, organizations, and/or data to conduct your research.

Identify who you might need to consult to gain permission to conduct your study.

Explain what potential issues you might encounter.

Explain how you might address these potential issues.

Compile Part 1 and Part 2 into one document for submission. IMPORTANT CLARIFICATION NOTE: Make this one paper of 600- 1025 words (use Level 1 headings to identify all topics discussed and have an introductory paragraph and a concluding paragraph) instead of a Part 1 and Part 2 paper.

Use the provided Student Paper Template to ensure proper APA formatting.

Include APA-formatted in-text citations and references.

For a well-structured scholarly paragraph please refer to the Paragraphing with the MEAL Plan section in Appendix B of the Student Paper Template.

Use the APA Tutorials located in Doctoral Writing Resources and format your paper according to APA guidelines. 

Reminder: Before submitting your assignment, proofread for grammar and sentence structure, re-read the assignment directions, and refer to the Summative Assessment rubric to ensure each element of the assignment has been addressed. 

 Submit your assignment.

 

RES709 Research Conceptualization And Design

Week 3 Assignment  

Problem Statement

All dissertations begin with a problem that justifies the need for the study. Without a clear and compelling problem, the study will add little importance or value to an academic discipline or profession. The problem statement is a critically important component of the dissertation. The problem statement explains the reason for your study and substantiates the importance of the research.

This assignment has two parts. Complete Parts 1 and 2 below within the template provided below (see the NOTE).

Part 1: Background of the Problem

Locate 2 or 3 peer-reviewed scholarly articles (published within the last 5 years: 2017-2022) from the University Library that address your proposed problem. 

Write a 350-700 word introduction to the problem in which you:

Provide a description and background of the identified problem.

Use the scholarly articles to support the existence of the problem. Be sure to use a scholarly voice.

Part 2: Problem Statement

View the Dissertation Series Tutorial – Problem Formulation.

Review the Problem Statement Worksheet from this week’s Discussion 2 and then review the two sample problems below:

SAMPLE PROBLEM 1: The problem is husbands caring for wives with breast cancer have a demanding caretaking schedule, resulting in failure to practice personal self-care (LeSeure & Chongkham-ang, 2015).

SAMPLE PROBLEM 2: The problem is despite extreme workplace stress, police officers lack stress management skills, resulting in diminished health, family life, and work performance (Toers-Bijins, 2012).

Based on the materials and the peer-review from DQ2, write a 1-sentence original problem statement for a prospective study you might conduct using the format below:

The problem is _____(state the problem), resulting in ______(state the consequence).

Include a citation to support the problem and provide a reference.

Place the background of your problem and your problem statement under the Problem Statement section of the provided Research Outline Template. The template is formatted according to APA guidelines.

NOTE: Beginning this week, you will be using the attached Research Outline Template for your assignments with the expectation that weekly revisions are incorporated from your instructor’s feedback. Clarification: Download this template and type right in it. Keep the template in its entirety and just fill in the information for the required week. Beginning this week, you will be using this template for your assignments. In future weeks, the expectation is that in addition to adding the new week’s item, that all revisions are incorporated from feedback from the previous week(s) and the Appendices are used as your change matrix along with other justification statements.

Checklist

State your program of study (e.g., DBA, DHA, DM, EDD) in the first section of the Research Outline Template.

Place the background of your problem and your problem statement in the Problem Statement section of the Research Outline Template. The template is formatted according to APA guidelines.

Format in-text citations and references according to APA guidelines.

Use the APA Tutorials located in Doctoral Writing Resources and format your paper according to APA guidelines.

For a well-structured scholarly paragraph please refer to the MEAL Plan document in Appendix H of the Research Outline Template.

Reminder: Before submitting your assignment, proofread for grammar and sentence structure, re-read the assignment directions, and refer to the grading rubric to ensure each element of the assignment has been addressed.

 

RES709 Research Conceptualization And Design

Week 4 Assignment  

Incorporating Feedback, Purpose Statement, and Research Alignment

Incorporating feedback is essential and beneficial in the learning process and is an expectation throughout the dissertation journey. Reading feedback, reflecting on the feedback, and then properly incorporating the feedback will help you progress through the dissertation journey and improve your writing, critical thinking, and APA formatting skills.

Change Matrix

A change matrix describes the changes you make to a document based on your instructor’s feedback.

Review the Purpose Statement Worksheet from this week’s Discussion 1 and the Week 3 feedback from your instructor on the background and your problem statement.

Using the Change Matrix located in Appendix A of the Research Outline Template, record the instructor’s feedback in the comment boxes in the first column (you can copy/paste). In the second column, state in your own words the feedback provided. In the third column, explain what you have done to address the feedback. Make all necessary revisions to the background of your problem and to your problem statement.

Continue using the Research Outline Template provided in Week 3:

Revise the background and your problem statement based on your instructor’s feedback from Week 3.

Add your proposed purpose statement to the Purpose Statement section of the

Research Outline Template and, in Appendix B of the template, provide an explanation of how your purpose statement aligns with the problem statement. Use scholarly tone and provide citations and references to substantiate your discussion.

Format in-text citations and references according to APA guidelines.

Use the APA Tutorials located in Doctoral Writing Resources and format your paper according to APA guidelines.

For a well-structured scholarly paragraph please refer to the MEAL Plan section in Appendix H of the Research Outline Template.

Reminder: Before submitting your assignment, proofread for grammar and sentence structure, re-read the assignment directions, and refer to the grading rubric to ensure each element of the assignment has been addressed.

 

RES709 Research Conceptualization And Design

Week 5 Assignment  

Research Questions and Alignment Summary

From this week’s overview, classroom materials, the understanding you gained from reviewing the finished dissertations, and the peer review from Discussion 2, develop a research question or questions to address your study’s purpose. You will be placing these in the Research Question section in the Research Outline Template that you began in Week 3.

Provide a 300- to 500-word substantiated summary on how your research question(s) align with the study’s purpose and place the references in the reference section. You will place this summary in Appendix D of the Research Outline Template.

Incorporating feedback is essential and beneficial in the learning process and is an expectation throughout the dissertation journey. Reading feedback, reflecting on the feedback, and then properly incorporating the feedback will help to progress through the dissertation journey and improve your writing, critical thinking, and APA formatting skills.

Change Matrix

A change matrix describes the changes you make to a document based on instructor feedback.

Review the Week 4 feedback from your instructor on the purpose statement and using the Change Matrix in Appendix C of the Research Outline Template, record the instructor’s feedback in the first column, state in your own words the feedback provided in the second column, and explain what you have done to address the feedback in the third column.

Checklist:

Continue to use the same Research Outline Template you began in Week 3:

Revise your problem and purpose statements based on your instructor’s feedback.

Add your research question(s) to the Research Question section of the Research Outline Template.

Provide your summary of how your research question(s)align with your study’s purpose in Appendix D of the Research Outline Template.

Format in-text citations and references according to APA guidelines.

Reminder: Before submitting your assignment, proofread for grammar and sentence structure, re-read the assignment directions, and refer to the grading rubric to ensure each element of the assignment has been addressed.

For a well-structured scholarly paragraph please refer to the MEAL Plan section in Appendix H of the Research Outline Template.

Use the APA Tutorials located in Doctoral Writing Resources and format your paper according to APA guidelines.

Submit your updated Research Outline Template.

 

RES709 Research Conceptualization And Design

Week 6 Assignment  

Summative Assessment: Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods Analysis and Application

When conducting research, it is necessary to know the difference between qualitative and quantitative research methods.

 This assignment has two parts. Complete Parts 1 and 2 below.

Part 1: Identifying Qualitative and Quantitative Research Characteristics

Locate 1 qualitative and 1 quantitative research article on a topic in your program of study (e.g., DBA, DHA, DM, EDD) from the University Library. Add the references to the articles you selected in the reference section of the Research Outline Template.

Write a 700- to 1,400-word analysis about the articles in which you:

Explain what characteristics make the study and research methods used quantitative.

Explain what characteristics make the study and research methods used qualitative.

Analyze the major differences between the 2 types of research methods.

 Refer to Quantitative and Qualitative Terminology for examples of qualitative or quantitative language that may be used in each article.

Note: Part 1 of this assignment needs to be submitted in a separate document using the Student Paper Template. Provide properly formatted citations and references. You will be using the Research Outline Template for Part 2 of the assignment.

Part 2: Supporting Selected Research Method Appropriateness

 Using peer-reviewed journal articles, classroom materials, and information from the weekly overview, select a research method (qualitative or quantitative) that you might use to achieve your study purpose.

Write a 200- to 350-word explanation of the research method you selected and why this method appropriately aligns with your problem, purpose, and research question. To help justify your chosen methodology, you may find it helpful to review and use as guides a few finished dissertations in the ProQuest database that used the same methodology you are considering. Substantiate your discussion and provide appropriate citations and references.

Incorporating feedback is essential and beneficial in the learning process and is an expectation throughout the dissertation journey. Reading feedback, reflecting on the feedback, and then properly incorporating the feedback will help to progress through the dissertation journey and improve your writing, critical thinking, and APA formatting skills.

Change Matrix

A change matrix describes the changes you make to a document based on instructor feedback.

Review the Week 5 feedback from your instructor on the research question(s) and using the Change Matrix in Appendix E of the Research Outline Template, record the instructor’s feedback in the first column, state in your own words the feedback provided in the second column, and explain what you have done to address the feedback in the third column.

 Checklist

Part 1:

Completed article analysis in a separate document, using the Student Example Paper.

Part 2:

Continue using the Research Outline Template provided in Week 3 and:

Revise your problem and purpose statements, if needed.

Revise the RQs from Week 5 based on instructor’s feedback.

Add your research method to the Methodology section and include an explanation, using scholarly tone, of why you selected the methodology. Substantiate your discussion using peer-reviewed literature.

Complete the Change Matrix in Appendix E of the Research Outline Template for feedback provided in Week 5.

Format in-text citations and references according to APA guidelines.

For a well-structured scholarly paragraph please refer to the MEAL Plan section in Appendix H of the Research Outline Template. 

Use the APA Tutorials located in Doctoral Writing Resources and format your paper according to APA guidelines.

Reminder: Before submitting your assignment, proofread for grammatical and sentence structure, re-read the assignment directions, and refer to the Summative Assessment rubric to ensure each element of the assignment has been addressed.

Submit Part 1 as a separate document.

Submit Part 2 as your updated Research Outline Template.

 

RES709 Research Conceptualization And Design

Week 7 Assignment  

Research Design

Assignment Content

For this week’s assignment, you will select an appropriate research design for your research plan. Once you have selected an appropriate design, you must locate and review references developed with the primary methodologists associated with that design. You can find a list of methodologists for each design in the CDS Dissertation Guide.

View “Selecting an Appropriate Research Design” and the CDS Dissertation Guide.

Note: A transcript of the video is available.

Select a research design that you might potentially use to achieve the purpose of your study.

Research Design

Write a 350-700-word summary on whether the research design you selected is a quantitative or qualitative method design and why this design appropriately aligns with your problem, purpose, and research question(s). Write in a scholarly tone and substantiate your discussion with peer-reviewed literature. Provide citations and references. Do not write this using personal pronouns (I. me, my, you, your, we, us, or our).

Note: You will be placing this discussion in the Research Outline Template under the Research Design section.

Incorporating feedback is essential and beneficial in the learning process and is an expectation throughout the dissertation journey. Reading feedback, reflecting on the feedback, and then properly incorporating the feedback will help to progress through the dissertation journey and improve your writing, critical thinking, and APA formatting skills.

Change Matrix

A change matrix describes the changes you make to a document based on instructor feedback.

Review the Week 6 feedback from your instructor on the research method and using the Change Matrix in Appendix F of the Research Outline Template, record the instructor’s feedback in the first column, state in your own words the feedback provided in the second column, and explain what you have done to address the feedback in the third column.

Checklist

Continue using the Research Outline Template provided in Week 3 and:

Revise your problem and purpose statements, if needed.

Revise the RQs from Week 5, if needed.

Revise the methodology section from Week 6 based on instructor’s feedback.

Add your research design discussion in the Research Design section. Substantiate your discussion using peer-reviewed literature.

Complete the Change Matrix in Appendix F of the Research Outline Template for feedback provided in Week 6.

Format in-text citations and references according to APA guidelines.

For a well-structured scholarly paragraph please refer to the MEAL Plan section in Appendix H of the Research Outline Template. 

Use the APA Tutorials located in Doctoral Writing Resources and format your paper according to APA guidelines.

Reminder: Before submitting your assignment, proofread for grammar and sentence structure, re-read the assignment directions, and refer to the grading rubric to ensure each element of the assignment has been addressed.

Submit your updated Research Outline Template.

 

RES709 Research Conceptualization And Design

Week 8 Assignment  

Summative Assessment: Framework, Significance, and Research Plan

Assignment Content

During the past 7 weeks you have been learning how to formulate a research plan, hopefully for your dissertation. The final assignment for RES/709 has 3 components:

Identify a theoretical and/or conceptual framework to frame your study. What existing theories, concepts, or models are relevant to your study?

Use the SPL Model to identify the significance of your study for scholars, practitioners, and leaders in your professional field.

Polish and refine your Research Outline Template by carefully going over all feedback to ensure the feedback has been incorporated. Compare and contrast the formatting of your Research Outline Template to the original.

 Incorporate the feedback and recommendations you received from your course colleagues for the following and add to your research plan.

Wk 8: DQ1 for the Framework section

Wk 8: DQ 2 for the Significance of the Study section

Change Matrix

Review the Week 7 feedback from your instructor on the research design and using a copy of the Change Matrix in Appendix G of the Research Outline Template, record the instructor’s feedback in the first column, state in your own words the feedback provided in the second column, and explain what you have done to address the feedback in the third column.

Checklist

Continue using the Research Outline Template provided in Week 3 and:

Revise your problem and purpose statements, if needed.

Revise the RQs, if needed.

Revise the research method, if needed.

Revise the design from Week 7, based on the instructor’s feedback.

Add the theoretical framework discussion from DQ1in the Framework section.

Add the significance discussion from DQ2 in the Significance of the Study section.

Complete the Change Matrix in Appendix G of the Research Outline Template for feedback provided in Week 7.

Format in-text citations and references according to APA guidelines.

 For a well-structured scholarly paragraph please refer to the MEAL Plan section in Appendix H of the Research Outline Template.

Use the APA Tutorials located in Doctoral Writing Resources and format your paper according to APA guidelines.

Reminder: Before submitting your assignment, proofread for grammar and sentence structure, re-read the assignment directions, and refer to the Summative Assessment rubric to ensure each element of the assignment has been addressed.