Assessment and Curriculum

  
Write a 640 word count and compare the issues that Mississippi has as relates to assessment and curriculum in the classroom in reading for students. Also, reflect on What is meant by “teaching to the test”? Why does this have such a negative connotation in the schools? Include a peer review article as it relates to curriculum Common Core Standards, and the Foundations of Reading.References
Afflerbach, P. (Ed.). (2010). Essential readings on assessment. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Allington, R. L. (2005). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Allington, R. L., & Walmsley, S. A. (2007). No quick fix, the RTI edition: Rethinking literacy programs in America’s elementary schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Athans, S. K., & Devine, D. A. (2010). Fun-tastic activities for differentiating comprehension instruction, grades 2-6. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Blythe, T., Allen, D., & Powell, B. S. (2007). Looking together at student work (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Vaughn, S. (Eds.). (2008). Response to intervention: A framework for reading educators. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
International Reading Association and National Council of Teachers of English. (2010). Standards for the assessment of reading and writing. Newark, DE: author.
Israel, S. E. (2007). Using metacognitive assessments to create individualized reading instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Jensen, E. (2005). Teaching with the brain in mind (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Scanlon, D. M., Anderson, Kimberly L. (2010). Using the interactive strategies approach to prevent reading difficulties in an RTI context. In M. Y. Lipson & K. K. Wixon (Eds.), Successful approaches to RTI: Collaborative practices for improving K-12 literacy. 
Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Spear-Swerling, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1994). The road not taken: An integrative theoretical model of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 91-103, 122.
Valencia, S. W., & Buly, M. R. (2004). Behind test scores: What struggling readers really need. The Reading Teacher, 57(6), 520-531.
Approximate price: $22
We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..

With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.