PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS AS INDICATED BELOW:
1). ZERO (0) PLAGIARISM
2). ATLEAST 5 REFERENCES, NO MORE THAN 5 YEARS
3). PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING ATTACHED RUBRIC DETAILS, and please refer to the grading rubric carefully and be sure to include each component in the assignment.
4). Include introduction, purpose statement and conclusion, reference page, (APA formatting)
Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.
In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template.
Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
Clark (2018)
Clark (2015)
Griffin and Clark (2014)
The Assignment (3-6 pages total):
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)
Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)
Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Work Environment Assessment Template
Use this document to complete the Module 4
Workplace Environment Assessment
.
Summary of Results – Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory
Identify two things that surprised you about the results. Also identify one idea that you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
What do the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace?
Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.
General Notes/Comments
Work Environment Assessment
Template
© 2018 Laureate Education Inc.
4
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6053_Module04_Week09_Assignment_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment
· Complete the Work Environment Assessment Template.
· Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
· Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea that you believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.
· Explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of your workplace.
Points:
Points Range:
45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
An accurate, detailed, and completed Work Environment Assessment Template is provided.
The responses accurately and thoroughly describe in detail the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace.
The responses accurately and clearly identify two surprising things about the results and thoroughly describe in detail at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.
The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
An accurate and completed Work Environment Assessment Template is provided.
The responses accurately describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace.
The responses accurately identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.
The responses accurately explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
A completed Work Environment Assessment Template that is vague or inaccurate is provided.
The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague or inaccurate.
The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague or inaccurate.
The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague or inaccurate.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
A vague and inaccurate Work Environment Assessment Template is provided, or is missing.
The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggest about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Feedback:
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature
· Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article you selected.
· Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
· Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.
Points:
Points Range:
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The responses accurately and thoroughly describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected.
The responses accurately and completely explain in detail how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment.
The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams.
Specific and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The responses accurately describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected.
The responses accurately explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment.
The responses accurately explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams.
Specific examples are provided which may support the responses.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague or inaccurate.
The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate.
The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague or inaccurate.
Vague or inaccurate examples are provided which may support the responses.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Specific examples are not provided to support the responses.
Feedback:
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams
· Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
· Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Points:
Points Range:
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend in detail at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.
The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend in detail at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
16 (16%) – 19 (19%)
The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.
The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy.
The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing.
The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points:
Points Range:
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
Points:
Points Range:
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Feedback:
Show Descriptions
Show Feedback
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment
· Complete the Work Environment Assessment Template.
· Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
· Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea that you believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.
· Explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of your workplace.
—
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent
45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
An accurate, detailed, and completed Work Environment Assessment Template is provided.
The responses accurately and thoroughly describe in detail the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace.
The responses accurately and clearly identify two surprising things about the results and thoroughly describe in detail at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.
The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.
Good
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
An accurate and completed Work Environment Assessment Template is provided.
The responses accurately describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace.
The responses accurately identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.
The responses accurately explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.
Fair
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
A completed Work Environment Assessment Template that is vague or inaccurate is provided.
The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague or inaccurate.
The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague or inaccurate.
The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague or inaccurate.
Poor
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
A vague and inaccurate Work Environment Assessment Template is provided, or is missing.
The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggest about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Feedback:
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature
· Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article you selected.
· Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
· Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The responses accurately and thoroughly describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected.
The responses accurately and completely explain in detail how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment.
The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams.
Specific and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses.
Good
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The responses accurately describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected.
The responses accurately explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment.
The responses accurately explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams.
Specific examples are provided which may support the responses.
Fair
11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague or inaccurate.
The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate.
The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague or inaccurate.
Vague or inaccurate examples are provided which may support the responses.
Poor
0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Specific examples are not provided to support the responses.
Feedback:
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams
· Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
· Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend in detail at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.
The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend in detail at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.
Good
16 (16%) – 19 (19%)
The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.
The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.
Fair
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy.
The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy.
Poor
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing.
The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Good
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
Fair
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
Poor
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Feedback: Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6053_Module04_Week09_Assignment_Rubric Work Environment Assessment Template Use this document to complete the Module 4 Workplace Environment Assessment . Summary of Results - Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory Identify two things that surprised you about the results. Also identify one idea that you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed. What do the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace? Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected. Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment. Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples. General Notes/Comments Work Environment Assessment Template © 2018 Laureate Education Inc. 4