Case Study Thirty-Six: The Electronic Medical Record: Efficient Medical Care or Disaster in the Making?/ MHA6999 WEEK 2 PROJECT

InstructionsSupporting Lectures: 
Review the following journal articles:
DeAngelis, J. (2019). Who guards the guardians? Simplifying the discovery of electronic medical records. University of Colorado Law Review, 90(1), 317–364.
Glied, S., & Sacarny, A. (2018). Is the US health care system wasteful and inefficient? A review of the evidence. Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law, 43(5), 739–765. 
Kuo, R.-Z. (2018). EMRS adoption: Exploring the effects of information security management awareness and perceived service quality. Health Policy and Technology, 7(4), 365–373. 
Project
The project assignment provides a forum for analyzing and evaluating relevant topics of this week on the basis of the course competencies covered.
Introduction:
You are the chief information officer (CIO) of a large healthcare system. Medicare has mandated that all medical practices seeking Medicare compensation must begin using electronic medical records (EMR). Medicare has incentivized medical practices to place EMR in their offices by giving financial bonuses to medical practices that achieve certain goals.
Tasks:
Case Study Thirty-Six: The Electronic Medical Record: Efficient Medical Care or Disaster in the Making?
Read the above case study; your task would be to evaluate this case study utilizing the format below. Make sure to include at least two scholarly/peer-reviewed articles to help support your evaluation.
Case Study EvaluationPrepare a written report of the case using the following format:Background Statement: What is going on in this case as it relates to the identified major problem?
What are (only) the key points the reader needs to know in order to understand how you will “solve” the case?
Summarize the scenario in your own words—do not simply regurgitate the case. Briefly describe the organization, setting, situation, who is involved, who decides what, etc. Specifically identify the major problems and secondary issues.
What are the real issues? What are the differences? Can secondary issues become major problems?Present an analysis of the causes and effects.Fully explain your reasoning. Declare your role in a sentence or a short paragraph explaining from which role you will address the major problem and whether you are the chief administrator in the case or an outside consultant called in to advise.
Regardless of your choice, you must justify in writing as to why you chose that role. What are the advantages and disadvantages of your selected role? Be specific.Recognize the strengths and weaknesses of the organization.Identify the strengths and weaknesses that exist in relation to the major problem. Again, your focus here should be in describing what the organization is capable of doing (and not capable of doing) with respect to addressing the major problem. Thus, the identified strengths and weaknesses should include those at the managerial level of the problem. For example, if you have chosen to address the problem from the departmental perspective and the department is understaffed, that is a weakness worthy of mentioning. Be sure to remember to include any strengths/weaknesses that may be related to diversity issues.Find out alternatives and recommend a solution.Describe the two to three alternative solutions you came up with. What feasible strategies would you recommend? What are the pros and cons? State what should be done—why, how, and by whom. Be specific. Evaluate how you would know when you’ve gotten there. There must be measurable goals put in place with the recommendations. Money is easiest to measure; what else can be measured? What evaluation plan would you put in place to assess whether you are reaching your goals?
TIP: Write this section as if you are trying to “sell” your proposed solution to the organization. Convince the reader that your proposed solution is the best available and that it will work as planned. Make sure that the goals you identify are worth the effort required to achieve them!To support your work, use your course and text readings and also use the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite all sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.
Submission Details:Name your file as SU_MHA6999_W2_Project_LastName_FirstName.
Your assignment should be addressed in a 4- to 6-page document.
By the due date assigned, submit it to the Submissions Area.    
Approximate price: $22
We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..

With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.