for njosh. due on tuesday

 
The Discussion Board (DB) is part of the core of online learning. Classroom discussion in an online environment requires the active participation of students and the instructor to create robust interaction and dialogue. Every student is expected to create an original response to the open-ended DB question as well as engage in dialogue by responding to posts created by others throughout the week. At the end of each unit, DB participation will be assessed based on both level of engagement and the quality of the contribution to the discussion.
At a minimum, each student will be expected to post an original and thoughtful response to the DB question and contribute to the weekly dialogue by responding to at least two other posts from students. The first contribution must be posted before midnight (Central Time) on Friday of each week. Two additional responses are required after Friday of each week. Students are highly encouraged to engage on the Discussion Board early and often, as that is the primary way the university tracks class attendance and participation.
The purpose of the Discussion Board is to allow students to learn through sharing ideas and experiences as they relate to course content and the DB question. Because it is not possible to engage in two-way dialogue after a conversation has ended, no posts to the DB will be accepted after the end of each unit.
Click here to refer to the instructions for the Unit 3 Lab tasks.
Please refer to the following for information about accessing and using LabSim
Getting Started with LabSim
This guide provides step-by-step instructions on the setup and usage of LabSim. In order to view this guide, click on the link entitled, ‘Getting Started – Student Accounts Not Activated by Teachers’. The link will open in the browser window. 
LabSim Navigation 
This guide will help you to learn about the navigation for LabSim. In order to view this guide, click on the link entitled, ‘Navigation’. This link will open in the browser window. 
There are a variety of security mechanisms available to protect the enterprise network. Discuss how an enterprise might be attacked and the type of security device or mechanism you would select to combat the attack. What would you envision as being the legal, social, and/or ethical implications of using the security device or mechanism?
In your own words, please post a response to the Discussion Board and comment on other postings. You will be graded on the quality of your postings.
For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.
Grading Rubric
Project CriteriaExceeds: 90%–100%Very good: 80%–89%Meets: 70%–79%Needs Improvement: Below 70%
Content
(40%)
Response covers all topics indicated in the assignment and adds additional content. The writing was of collegiate level with no errors in spelling or grammar.Response covers most topics indicated in the assignment. The writing was of collegiate level with one or less errors in spelling or grammar.Response covers many topics indicated in the assignment. The writing was of collegiate level with two or less errors in spelling or grammar.Response covers none to some of the topics indicated in the assignment. The writing was less than collegiate level with errors in spelling or grammar.
Interaction
(40%)
Multiple learner interactions per week that add to the discussion. Responses show evidence of critical analysis with questions to other classmates.At least three learner interactions per week that add to the discussion. Responses show evidence of critical analysis.No less than two learner interactions per week that add to the discussion. Responses show evidence of critical analysis.Zero to one learner interaction per week in the discussion board. Response lacks evidence of critical analysis.
Supporting Analysis
(20%)
Analysis exceeded minimum requirements. Appropriate sources were used to support analysis and were properly referenced.Basic analysis provided to support discussion. When appropriate to support discussion, appropriate sources were cited and properly referenced.Some limited analysis provided to support discussion. When appropriate to support discussion, sources were cited, appropriate, and properly referenced.No or inaccurate analysis, no sources were cited when needed, analysis and/or sources were not appropriate. When sources used, were not properly referenced. 
Approximate price: $22
We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..

With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.