Logical Fallacies

The West Bank is an area on the Jordan River as described by Arian. The position of it has been the topic of concession concerning the Palestinians and Israelis. Israel disputes that its existence is vindicated because Israel’s eastern edge is not definite and according to the Camp David Accords in 1978, the decisive standing of it would be set only when there is a stable concord between the opposing states (Arian).
Palestinian public opinion, on the other hand, is roughly undisputed in disparate Israeli settler existence on it as a breach of their right to autonomy. They claim it should be a portion of their realm and that the existence of Israeli armed hegemony is a contravention of their entitlement to independence. Furthermore, as stated by Arian, they must have the area to minimize Palestinian violence  by equipped intercession and relocation of the East Jerusalem Palestinian inhabitants.
As a response to this issue, since there are a number of logical fallacies in it, the Israelis must either pull back or not. In view of the facts that the boundaries of both parties are not yet defined, they must first take action to set their frontiers as soon as possible to stop the dispute.Major logical fallacies that can be observed in the article which contributed to my conclusion are the following. The misuse of “not” can be observed in the part of the paragraph that “the Israelis must either pull back or not”. Abuse of “and” can also be viewed in the statement “Palestinian terrorism by armed intervention and transfer of the East Jerusalem Palestinian population”.
Generalization can be seen in “transfer of the East Jerusalem Palestinian population”. Causal misleading notion like “Palestinian public opinion, on the other hand, is roughly undisputed in disparate Israeli settler existence on it as a breach of their right to autonomy. They claim it should be a portion of their realm and that the existence of Israeli armed hegemony is a contravention of their entitlement to independence” can lastly be perceived because one thing leads to another idea (Downes).
References:
Arian, Asher. “A Further Turn to the Right: Israeli Public Opinion on National Security”. 2002. 5 June
2007. http://www.tau.ac.il/jcss/sa/v5n1p4Ari.html.
Downes, Stephen. “Guide to the Logical Fallacies”. 2001. 5 June 2007.
http://onegoodmove.org/fallacy/howto.htm.
Approximate price: $22
We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..

With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.